Category talk:Ships:Civilian - Revision history

Pirx at 23:10, 4 March 2005

2005-03-04T23:10:38Z

Pirx at 23:10, 4 March 2005

2005-03-04T23:10:05Z

Pirx at 23:09, 4 March 2005

2005-03-04T23:09:18Z

Ctv at 22:59, 4 March 2005

2005-03-04T22:59:14Z

Ctv at 05:55, 4 March 2005

2005-03-04T05:55:25Z

Pirx at 23:24, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T23:24:06Z

Pirx at 23:23, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T23:23:24Z

Ctv at 23:12, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T23:12:19Z

Pirx at 22:57, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T22:57:18Z

Pirx at 22:49, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T22:49:13Z

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 [[Namespace1:Namespace2:Itemname|Itemname]] <small>Namespace1:Namespace2:(Itemname)</small>
 </pre>
 : Ok, we actually have not more that one namespace so it would look like this most of the time:
 <pre>
 [[Namespace:Itemname|Itemname]] <small>Namespace:(Itemname)</small>
 </pre>
 : The biggest problem will be code-side of this though, i'm not really familiar with php :?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 4 March 2005
Line 33:		Line 33:

	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 14:59, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) At some point, we should clean up all the Ship/Ships stuff that's no longer being used:-\		*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 14:59, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) At some point, we should clean up all the Ship/Ships stuff that's no longer being used:-\
−	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:09, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) True, especially everything linked in [[Category:Ships]]	+	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:09, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) True, especially everything linked in [[:Category:Ships]]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 14:49, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) OOOHHHHH shiny, i think i have found the (easier?/better?) solution to our problem http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Order_of_the_lists.3B_setting_sort_keys
-** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] Seems to work just fine. i tested the Acrotatus with it [[:Category:Ships:Civilian]] .. here's the categroy code
+** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] Seems to work just fine. i tested the Acrotatus with it [[:Category:Vessels:Civilian]] .. here's the categroy code
 <pre>
 [[Category:Database]]
 [[Category:VS Tech]]
-[[Category:Ships|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels|Acrotatus]]
-[[Category:Ships:Civilian|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels:Civilian|Acrotatus]]
-[[Category:Ships:Production:Aera|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels:Production:Aera|Acrotatus]]
-[[Category:Ships:Use:Aera|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels:Use:Aera|Acrotatus]]
-[[Category:Ships:Use:Bzbr|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels:Use:Bzbr|Acrotatus]]
-[[Category:Ships:Passenger|Acrotatus]]
+[[Category:Vessels:Passenger|Acrotatus]]
 </pre>
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 14:59, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) At some point, we should clean up all the Ship/Ships stuff that's no longer being used:-\

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 4 March 2005
Line 31:		Line 31:

	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 21:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) So, I've decided to go with a Vessels: Installations: namespace split, and I've taken your suggestion for simplifying the category names for used by - that way we can put tech and upgrades and other things into the used by and produced by categories.		*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 21:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) So, I've decided to go with a Vessels: Installations: namespace split, and I've taken your suggestion for simplifying the category names for used by - that way we can put tech and upgrades and other things into the used by and produced by categories.
		+
		+	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 14:59, 4 Mar 2005 (PST) At some point, we should clean up all the Ship/Ships stuff that's no longer being used:-\

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 4 March 2005
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:: But if we make a second Namespace "Installation:" we should rename the "Category:Ships:Use:xxx" categories (and similar) into something like "'''Category:Usedby:Aera'''" <small>or even just use the category "Category:Species:Aera"/"Category:Faction:xxx" to ignore the type of unit</small>.		:: But if we make a second Namespace "Installation:" we should rename the "Category:Ships:Use:xxx" categories (and similar) into something like "'''Category:Usedby:Aera'''" <small>or even just use the category "Category:Species:Aera"/"Category:Faction:xxx" to ignore the type of unit</small>.
	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:24, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) PS: I'm off to sleep now ;)		** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:24, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) PS: I'm off to sleep now ;)
		+
		+	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 21:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) So, I've decided to go with a Vessels: Installations: namespace split, and I've taken your suggestion for simplifying the category names for used by - that way we can put tech and upgrades and other things into the used by and produced by categories.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 3 March 2005
Line 28:		Line 28:
	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:23, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) I actually thought about exactly the same issue before noon today too. I wouldn't mind to put everything into Ship (despite the misnomer), but in retrospective a "Unit:" namespace would have been better (what do you think?), but i think it's to much work to change that now :?		** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:23, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) I actually thought about exactly the same issue before noon today too. I wouldn't mind to put everything into Ship (despite the misnomer), but in retrospective a "Unit:" namespace would have been better (what do you think?), but i think it's to much work to change that now :?
	:: But if we make a second Namespace "Installation:" we should rename the "Category:Ships:Use:xxx" categories (and similar) into something like "'''Category:Usedby:Aera'''" <small>or even just use the category "Category:Species:Aera"/"Category:Faction:xxx" to ignore the type of unit</small>.		:: But if we make a second Namespace "Installation:" we should rename the "Category:Ships:Use:xxx" categories (and similar) into something like "'''Category:Usedby:Aera'''" <small>or even just use the category "Category:Species:Aera"/"Category:Faction:xxx" to ignore the type of unit</small>.
		+	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:24, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) PS: I'm off to sleep now ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 3 March 2005
Line 26:		Line 26:

	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 15:12, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Looks good to me :) One final thought - do we want to split Vessels (Ship:) and Installations (Installation:) into their own categories, or (simpler though vaguely a misnomer) put everything in Ship: ?		*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 15:12, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Looks good to me :) One final thought - do we want to split Vessels (Ship:) and Installations (Installation:) into their own categories, or (simpler though vaguely a misnomer) put everything in Ship: ?
		+	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 15:23, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) I actually thought about exactly the same issue before noon today too. I wouldn't mind to put everything into Ship (despite the misnomer), but in retrospective a "Unit:" namespace would have been better (what do you think?), but i think it's to much work to change that now :?
		+	:: But if we make a second Namespace "Installation:" we should rename the "Category:Ships:Use:xxx" categories (and similar) into something like "'''Category:Usedby:Aera'''" <small>or even just use the category "Category:Species:Aera"/"Category:Faction:xxx" to ignore the type of unit</small>.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 3 March 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[[Category:Ships:Passenger\|Acrotatus]]		[[Category:Ships:Passenger\|Acrotatus]]
	</pre>		</pre>
		+
		+	*[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 15:12, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Looks good to me :) One final thought - do we want to split Vessels (Ship:) and Installations (Installation:) into their own categories, or (simpler though vaguely a misnomer) put everything in Ship: ?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 3 March 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	* [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 14:49, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) OOOHHHHH shiny, i think i have found the (easier?/better?) solution to our problem http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Order_of_the_lists.3B_setting_sort_keys		* [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 14:49, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) OOOHHHHH shiny, i think i have found the (easier?/better?) solution to our problem http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Order_of_the_lists.3B_setting_sort_keys
		+	** [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] Seems to work just fine. i tested the Acrotatus with it [[:Category:Ships:Civilian]] .. here's the categroy code
		+	<pre>
		+	[[Category:Database]]
		+	[[Category:VS Tech]]
		+	[[Category:Ships\|Acrotatus]]
		+	[[Category:Ships:Civilian\|Acrotatus]]
		+	[[Category:Ships:Production:Aera\|Acrotatus]]
		+	[[Category:Ships:Use:Aera\|Acrotatus]]
		+	[[Category:Ships:Use:Bzbr\|Acrotatus]]
		+	[[Category:Ships:Passenger\|Acrotatus]]
		+	</pre>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 3 March 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: [[Namespace:Itemname\|Itemname]] <small>Namespace:(Itemname)</small>		: [[Namespace:Itemname\|Itemname]] <small>Namespace:(Itemname)</small>
	: The biggest problem will be code-side of this though, i'm not really familiar with php :?		: The biggest problem will be code-side of this though, i'm not really familiar with php :?
		+
		+	* [[User:pontiac\|pontiac]] 14:49, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) OOOHHHHH shiny, i think i have found the (easier?/better?) solution to our problem http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Order_of_the_lists.3B_setting_sort_keys