Talk:Development - Revision history

pyramid: /* Subsectons: Keep or Abolish? */

2008-01-21T01:39:55Z

‎Subsectons: Keep or Abolish?

Halleck: Agree, but let's try to reach a consensus

2006-01-11T14:54:55Z

Agree, but let's try to reach a consensus

Zeog at 13:38, 11 January 2006

2006-01-11T13:38:34Z

Halleck: oops, i think i missed something

2006-01-11T10:50:48Z

oops, i think i missed something

Halleck: Subsectons: Keep or Abolish?

2006-01-11T10:48:39Z

Subsectons: Keep or Abolish?

New page

== Subsectons: Keep or Abolish? ==

Do we need the subsections such as Development:Graphics?
I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection '''only''' (i.e. '''not''' on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development. (Subsection names could potentially still be used to categorize pages, such as [[Development:Graphics:Logos & Signage]], though it's arguable whether this would be better handled by categories and proper positioning on the main Development page.)
-[[User:Halleck|Halleck]] 02:48, 11 January 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 21 January 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Sounds like the best way to handle this. However, moving everything over to Development and updating parent links will take a substantial amount of labor, so let's try to reach some kind of a consensus before we proceed. -[[User:Halleck\|Halleck]] 06:54, 11 January 2006 (PST)		:Sounds like the best way to handle this. However, moving everything over to Development and updating parent links will take a substantial amount of labor, so let's try to reach some kind of a consensus before we proceed. -[[User:Halleck\|Halleck]] 06:54, 11 January 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	Contents from Development:Graphics and Development:Guidelines have been merged to Development --[[User:pyramid\|pyramid]] 17:39, 20 January 2008 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 11 January 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --[[User:Zeog\|Zeog]] 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST)		The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --[[User:Zeog\|Zeog]] 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	:Sounds like the best way to handle this. However, moving everything over to Development and updating parent links will take a substantial amount of labor, so let's try to reach some kind of a consensus before we proceed. -[[User:Halleck\|Halleck]] 06:54, 11 January 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 11 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection '''only''' (i.e. '''not''' on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development.		I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection '''only''' (i.e. '''not''' on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development.
	-[[User:Halleck\|Halleck]] 02:48, 11 January 2006 (PST)		-[[User:Halleck\|Halleck]] 02:48, 11 January 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --[[User:Zeog\|Zeog]] 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Do we need the subsections such as Development:Graphics?
-I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection '''only''' (i.e. '''not''' on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development. (Subsection names could potentially still be used to categorize pages, such as [[Development:Graphics:Logos & Signage]], though it's arguable whether this would be better handled by categories and proper positioning on the main Development page.)
+I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection '''only''' (i.e. '''not''' on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development.
 -[[User:Halleck|Halleck]] 02:48, 11 January 2006 (PST)