Talk:Vessels and Installations - Revision history

Nachtwolf: Talk:Vessels & Installations moved to Talk:Vessels and Installations

2008-10-11T10:03:07Z

Talk:Vessels & Installations moved to Talk:Vessels and Installations

2005-07-09T14:57:30Z

replies

2005-07-08T14:13:15Z

‎Blueprints

2005-07-08T14:08:43Z

‎Layout of a Vessel or Installation page

2005-07-08T10:25:16Z

2005-07-08T10:23:57Z

replies

2005-06-30T19:31:17Z

‎Layout of a Vessel or Installation page

2005-06-30T19:28:38Z

blueprint answer + layout question

2005-06-30T01:07:46Z

2005-06-29T11:08:24Z

edit by TyKeiL

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ** [[User:TyKeiL|TyKeiL]] 03:23, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - These images are half sized the originals which were 1024x768, so i can supply them if needed.<BR/>I also want to put information on the images like lables for different things, ie engine types, gun specs, speed, cargo capacity, aerodynamic info(for flying in atmosphere) anything that will spruce up the images making them look more professional and nice.
 *** [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 07:13, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) I really like the idea, but you have to keep in mind that the infos may change in the future (position, numbers, names, etc...) so providing the graphic source files to the community (ask the devs for upload) is a necessity.
 =Layout of a Vessel or Installation page=
@@ Line 34: / Line 35: @@
 ** [[User:TyKeiL|TyKeiL]] 03:25, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - I agree to move the model and texture info to the dev section, but people still need there pictures so as jackS said to me in the PM before make both link to the same image.
 *** [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 07:08, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) I was a bit unclear in my statement above. I meant to move all the development bits (textures, status of the modes, etc..) to the development section, but keep the 'finished' images and such (e.g your blueprints/pictures) on the 'Vessel'-pages. :D

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 *** [[User:TyKeiL|TyKeiL]] 03:23, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) @Pontiac - excellent.
 ** [[User:TyKeiL|TyKeiL]] 03:23, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - These images are half sized the originals which were 1024x768, so i can supply them if needed.<BR/>I also want to put information on the images like lables for different things, ie engine types, gun specs, speed, cargo capacity, aerodynamic info(for flying in atmosphere) anything that will spruce up the images making them look more professional and nice.
 =Layout of a Vessel or Installation page=

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 8 July 2005
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* [[User:pontiac\|Pontiac]] 12:28, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT) I wonder if we could move the model and texture-info into the development section (i suggest the [[Development:3D Models]] page). and put in a header like "Blueprint" or "Ship Design" or something like that.		* [[User:pontiac\|Pontiac]] 12:28, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT) I wonder if we could move the model and texture-info into the development section (i suggest the [[Development:3D Models]] page). and put in a header like "Blueprint" or "Ship Design" or something like that.
	** [[User:TyKeiL\|TyKeiL]] 03:25, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - I agree to move the model and texture info to the dev section, but people still need there pictures so as jackS said to me in the PM before make both link to the same image.		** [[User:TyKeiL\|TyKeiL]] 03:25, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - I agree to move the model and texture info to the dev section, but people still need there pictures so as jackS said to me in the PM before make both link to the same image.
		+	*** [[User:pontiac\|Pontiac]] 07:08, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) I was a bit unclear in my statement above. I meant to move all the development bits (textures, status of the modes, etc..) to the development section, but keep the 'finished' images and such (e.g your blueprints/pictures) on the 'Vessel'-pages. :D

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 =Layout of a Vessel or Installation page=
 * [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 12:28, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT) I wonder if we could move the model and texture-info into the development section (i suggest the [[Development:3D Models]] page). and put in a header like "Blueprint" or "Ship Design" or something like that.
-** [[User:TykeiL|TyKeiL]] 19:50, 8 Jul 2005 - I agree to move the model and texture info to the dev section, but people still need there pictures so as jackS said to me in the PM before make both link to the same image.
+** [[User:TyKeiL|TyKeiL]] 03:25, 8 Jul 2005 (PDT) - I agree to move the model and texture info to the dev section, but people still need there pictures so as jackS said to me in the PM before make both link to the same image.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 * [[User:TyKeiL|TykeiL]] June 29th 2005 hey, i have added some blueprint style images to some of the pages, hope you like. i really think that on the main page the names of the ships should be accompanied with there HUD image. that way people will get a peek at what they will be looking into.
 ** [[User:jackS|jackS]] 18:07, 29 Jun 2005 (PDT) @Tykeil - check your PM inbox
 ** [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 12:28, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT) I like the blueprints, they are pretty cool 8)<BR/> Using the HUD-images of the ships/stations as a preview is a very good idea, i thni nobody will be against that :D
 =Layout of a Vessel or Installation page=
 * [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 12:28, 30 Jun 2005 (PDT) I wonder if we could move the model and texture-info into the development section (i suggest the [[Development:3D Models]] page). and put in a header like "Blueprint" or "Ship Design" or something like that.

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:03, 11 October 2008
(No difference)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 * Wouldn't it be better to have the ships in an extra namespace like this [[Vessel:Acrotatus]] as it is with the [[Terminology]] right now ? [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 01:22, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
 ** Of course it would be quite easy to move the pages to this new locations (there are just alot of them ;) ) [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 01:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 **** [[User:pontiac|Pontiac]] 06:47, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT) I'm not against the previous/next links, but i still think it's too much effort... especially if you see most of the existing prev/next links, which still have the '''Ship:xxx''' prefix and the top links points to '''Ships'''. ''To make it clear'' that needs to be changed to the '''Vessel:''' prefix etc... Further just think about name changes and new Vessels. For each change you need to change two other pages (alphabetical prev + next) to reflect this change/addition. But maybe there will but less changes then i am imagine right now.. in this chase my arguments nullify. Just my 2c ;)
 ** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 23:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Maybe we could just use something like this: [[Template:Parent_link]] to link to the parent (e.g Vessels & Installations)  page.
 {{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}
 <pre>
 {{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}
 </pre>
-[[User:jackS|jackS]] 18:07, 29 Jun 2005 (PDT) @Tykeil - check your PM inbox
+=Layout of a Vessel of Installation page=

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 30 June 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:
	{{Parent_link \| parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}		{{Parent_link \| parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}
	</pre>		</pre>
		+
		+	[[User:jackS\|jackS]] 18:07, 29 Jun 2005 (PDT) @Tykeil - check your PM inbox