Difference between revisions of "Weapon:Disruptor beam (long range)"
(added texture) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{reqcargoimage}} | {{reqcargoimage}} | ||
{{Description:Beam| | {{Description:Beam| | ||
| − | |text= | + | |text=A variant of the [[Weapon:Disruptor beam|Disruptor Beam]], this weapon uses the same functional principals, but is engineered for use at long range. |
| − | + | Projecting something that is, in many respects, an extremely long sliver of a shield poses a number of technical difficulties. Long range disruptor beams increase the effective range of the weapon, but at the cost of dramatic reductions to efficiency, damage output, and beam stability alongside a significantly increased physical size. However, for certain applications, such as point-defense emplacements, these trade-offs have been considered more than worthwhile. | |
| − | |image= | + | |
| + | |image=../weapons/disruptorbeam.png | ||
|name=Disruptor Beam (long range) | |name=Disruptor Beam (long range) | ||
|price=1,200,000 | |price=1,200,000 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
|phase damage=N/A | |phase damage=N/A | ||
|range=26,000 | |range=26,000 | ||
| − | |rate= | + | |rate=10000 |
|stability=0.15 | |stability=0.15 | ||
|refire delay=0.05 | |refire delay=0.05 | ||
Latest revision as of 14:44, 7 September 2010
 Beam
|
| It is requested that a new image should be included for this cargo item, if possible. Once suitable additions have been made and added to SVN, you may remove this template message. See Category:Requested_cargo_images for other cargo items that are in need of images. |
|
A variant of the Disruptor Beam, this weapon uses the same functional principals, but is engineered for use at long range.
Projecting something that is, in many respects, an extremely long sliver of a shield poses a number of technical difficulties. Long range disruptor beams increase the effective range of the weapon, but at the cost of dramatic reductions to efficiency, damage output, and beam stability alongside a significantly increased physical size. However, for certain applications, such as point-defense emplacements, these trade-offs have been considered more than worthwhile.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
