HowTo:FullUnwrap6Seams

From VsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Placing Seams

So, what are "seams"? Seams are kind of like "cuts". But these cuts don't affect your geometry. Seams are NOT "sharp edges" by any stretch of the imagination, though often sharp edges make good choices for places to run seams. Seams are "texture cuts". If you have contiguous and non-split polygons A and B, the unwrapping tools will try to put them next to each other on the texture. But a texture being flat, doing so with all polygons would be unsustainable. So, Blender gives you a way to decide how you want to cut up your mesh when it comes to texturing. Naturally, a bad place to place a seam is through the middle of a section of mesh that will show a picture of the Mona Lisa. You'd have to put part of her picture in one place, and another part in another...

Good choices of places for seams are:

  1. Lines where there's a sharp change of material.
  2. Lines along perfectly featureless coloration.
  3. Lines out of sight and in dark or semi-hidden areas.

But you also need to think about how are you going to unwrap each part of the object. No sense placing a seam in a place where none is needed, regardless how good a place it may be. One wants to be frugal with seams. The more pieces you break your texture mapping, the more objects you end up having to sort out and organize in the UV window.

It's always easier to start planning from the biggest parts, to the smallest. Our biggest part is the fat fuselage. The fact that it is almost round, tells me that the best way to go with it will be using "Cylindrical Unwrap. That is, once we get to UV unwrapping, we'll look at the ship from the front, and then, from the Unwrap menu choose Cylindrical. This will roll the hull out like a tape. Of course, this wouldn't work too well for the tower and the wings, so we're going to "cut them off" (texturing-wise only), by placing seams right along their welds. To place a seam, you have to be in Edit mode, Line Select; so you select a line along edges (Alt-right-click and Shift-Alt-right-click are often useful here) and Ctrl-E -> Mark Seam. By default, seams look brown in the edit window.

Note that you don't need to place seams along split edges. Split edges already "imply" a seam. So, if you did a thorough job of splitting your smooth groups, you won't need too many seams.

So, let's start by splitting off the wing. (Note: I'm assuming you know about the Mirror attribute, and that your model is mirrored in X so that you only have to work on one side of the ship, and the other side automatically mirrors what you do. If you don't know what I'm talking about, you really need to do a bunch of beginners' Blender tutorials first...). Okay, let's see... Problem! The engines are in the way! How are we going to draw the seam?


blender_shot_3.jpg


If the engines were a separate object, we could move them to another layer, but now the whole ship is one object! Well, there are other ways. This should be obvious, but I'll spell it out just in case. We made the material of our engines "Stainless", so we can just do a selection by material...


blender_shot_4.jpg

blender_shot_5.jpg


... and press H to Hide it...


blender_shot_6.jpg


Avra Kadavra! The way to Reveal things we hide will be the subject of a future tutorial... :D

Allright, so let's get started: Top edge of the wing's weld:


blender_shot_7.jpg


You might ask "why do we pick *that* line, and not, say, the one below?". Well, there's a reason: the strip of quads below the line is the actual 45 degree bevel strip. I prefer to leave that bevel strip as part of the wing, rather than as part of the hull. Why? Because, either way, we'll have to LSCM the strip so its projection doesn't get compressed. So the narrow projection of the strip will kind of flare out a bit as we flatten it. But while this is okay to do at the edge of the wing's unwrap; it's not so clean if it's part of the hull, because when we take the wing out of the hull it leaves a rectangular hole; but if we have bent edges around the hole that need to stretch out, they'll actually stretche "in" --into the hole in the hull, which means that their lengths will have to decrease for their widths to increase. Often LSCM goes nuts when you try to make it do that. So, try to only catch polys that will map fairly straight, when you're seaming the boundaries of a big piece by cutting smaller parts out of it. Leave the troublesome parts for later. Procrastinate.

Here's my cut at the front end of the wing:


blender_shot_8.jpg


And NOW I realise I have too many bloody polygons around this area... We'll place the seams first; I'll come back to this later...

Here's my cut under the wing:


blender_shot_9.jpg


And here's my cut at the back of the wing:


blender_shot10.jpg


Now, verify in transparent mode that the loop is closed, then Ctrl-E -> Mark Seam:


blender_shot11.jpg


Same thing for the tower:


blender_shot12.jpg


Now we cut out the front-facing part of the hull:


blender_shot13.jpg


We have to, as a cylindrical unwrap of the main hull would miss a front-facing plane entirely. But you might ask, didn't I say I didn't want to catch 45 degree strips into the main hull? Well, in the case of the wings and the towers that is so, because when we cut them out, we leave holes in the hull unwrap. But in the case of the front plane we don't have to worry about strips flaring inwards into a hole, because the edges adjacent to the front plane will all be on the left side of the texture, lining up vertically. And I'd rather have those 45 degree strips with the hull, because I will probably put impacts and scraches there that should smear or fudge or fade backwards along the sides of the hull; and if I put those bevels elsewhere in the texture it would be pretty hard to match a scratch begining in one island and continuing in another.

Additionally, if you look at the paint, you'll see that my seam goes along the edges of the paint. This will allow me to better separate and group islands by material.

And what are those extra seams making V-signs at the corners?

Those are there so that when the bevel strips flare out they don't have to stretch like contortionists. They are "relief cuts".

Let's do the bottom tower:


blender_shot14.jpg


Note that the towers and the front, not to speak of the wings, will need further seams. We'll add more seams when we get to them; right now we're not working on the towers or wings or anything other than the main hull. One thing at a time... Now the back:


blender_shot15.jpg


Done with the main hull. What?! Yes; we don't need to put seams for the boxes at the top and bottom because they are already split. We don't need seams for the inside surfaces of the intakes, because they are also split already. Smooth groups, remember? Ahh, but we do need a couple more seams; hold on... Here:


blender_shot16.jpg


The reason we need those there is that the surface going in there is continuous with the hull. Only the upside-down surfaces are split. So, those parts inside the "vents" need to be put elsewhere on the texture; otherwise they'd overlap with the outside of the vent, in the cylindrical unwrap.

Now we're really done with the hull. What's next? We said we'd start with the biggest parts first. I'm not sure what's the next-biggest part... Probably the wings.

Different people have different ways of doing things. Most Blenderheads swear by LSCM. Me, I don't like LSCM, --at all. Why? Because I like my things aligned, sort of. Specially the front-to-back direction on the ship, I want it to align horizontally in the texture. LSCM is an "obsessed algorithm", IMO; that only cares for surface equalization, and for which everything else is secondary. For me, front-back alignment is a primary concern; and surface area equalization is kind of the last item in my long list of priorities. The way I work is I use Unwrap -> From View. Naturally, therefore, that's how we'll do this tutorial. If I tried to teach the way someone else works, I probably wouldn't do it right, anyways.

There are 6 views that interest us: Front, back, top, bottom, left and right. As such, prepairing the seams is easy. Here I've seamed up the wing:


blender_shot17.jpg


Ehmm... Yes, if it looks like I've made a major clean-up of the mesh, it's because I have; and I'm not quite done with it either. Expect to see more polygon reduction crackdowns as we proceed... And, by the way, what I did to display titanium parts only, was to select them (by material), then menu Select -> Inverse, so that everything that's NOT made of titanium is selected, and then H to hide. And as I did that I discovered many little polygons floating in the middle of nowhere... Facets that I meant to assign a different material to them, bot missed them. Cleaning up the mesh is a job that's never done... I'll fix that next, won't re-upload the pic above; better for the garbage to show there, for the record. So, I realize now that this is something that should be done in a systematic way. Select one material at a time, inverse selection, hide; and then visually verify that everything that's there should be there. Otherwise select the mis-materialized pieces, assign the correct materia to them, and hide them. Then Reveal everything, and do the same in the next material in the list. Alright, let me do just that...


blender_shot18.jpg


Okay, done cleaning up the titanium family. I even found floating edges without faces "made of titanium". Meshes are like white socks; --never perfectly clean. I'll do the other materials later.

Anyways, back to the seams in the wing: There's always the question of which view gets the bevel strips. I gave the top-bottom views the top priority; side-view second; and front/back views last. Why? Front and back views should always have the last priority, for the reason I stated earlier: Part of the texturing will be to represent impacts and scrathes. Some of those impacts should begin at a partially front-facing bevel and then fade towards the back. To represent the fading of such impacts, we can use linear blurs in Gimp, but Gimp knows nothing about the UV-mapping; --i.e.: it couldn't begin a blur in one island and continue it on another. So what we want is for such bevels to be already on the left edge, and part of, an island in the texture. Then an impact is basically a dot within the bevel strip, in the texture, and we can just motion-blur or smudge the dot towards the right, and the smudge will proceed towards the right in the texture; --over polys that follow behind, in the mesh. As for whether the top/bottom views should get priority vis a vis the side view, or viceversa, over which gets the longitudinal bevel strips, this is a matter of taste. I usually give that priority to whichever are the larger pieces, but it's just a matter of personal preference, and more for the sake of having a rule I follow, than any technical consideration.

Still proceeding from largest to smallest pieces, next in the list would be the dockings. Here we have a bit of descision to make: What do we do with the inclined surfaces facing towards the engines? If we unwrap them from top or bottom view, the rectangles for those areas in the UV-map will be compressed. If we unwrap them from side-views, the'll be compressed also. If we LSCM them, they will get deformed, like parallelograms probably; and we'll have to fix them by hand. Or else we could turn the view until we see them flat, and unwrap them from that view... I'm going to unwrap them from top and bottom views; because, in this case at least, I don't care about a texture stretch at a place that's so hidden from view and probably featureless anyhow. So, same general method as with the wing:


blender_shot19.jpg


And as with titanium, selecting the green paint parts uncovered things that were green that shouldn't be, and another clean-up took place. I've been fixing so many things, from blotched normals to unneeded vertices to wrong material assignments, that I couldn't hel make a new render to see how those fixes so far affect the final result...


Cutter43.jpg

Cutter44.jpg


Looking nicer and cleaner, as expected.


Proceeding from largest to smallest parts, I think what comes next is the front and back facing sections of the hull.

The front is just a matter of separating the battering ram. I ate my words and jumped to the occasion to seam up the ram itself. No seams are needed around the opening because that edge is already split.


blender_shot20.jpg


The back actually doesn't need almost anything done to it, because it's already all split up by smooth-grouping, including the Apollo/Soyuz dock. All those rings have sharp edges all around, which means they are split from each other. All that needs to be done to it is a few cuts to be able to unroll the cylindrical items; plus the little boxes...


blender_shot21.jpg

blender_shot22.jpg


Those little cube boxes have no backs, so where the seam lines end, that's the edge. I will just unwrap them from view first, pin down the camera facing square, and LSCM the seam-cut sides, let them flare out like an asterisk ('*'). Why? Well, for something so small I can't bother myself with separating it into views. The sticks attached to the squares are actually U-shaped, with no backs, so no need for seam cuts there.

Next item in the size-sorted list ought to be the engines... Being that the engines are pretty much cylindrical, it would be ludicrous to use any kind of unwrapping other than cylindrical. But not every part of the engines, of course. The front-facing parts should stay front-facing. The back-facing parts should stay back-facing. And then there's the question of how to handle the spherical front end, the pipes, the superconducting coil (ring), and the exhaust interior... Let's begin with the easy stuff, tho: The main cylindrical skin will unroll in one piece. We just need one seam cut for each engine. Where? I'd say we put the cut at the line nearest the wing. That's the least visible area, and that's always a good choice for seams ;-) So, select by material Stainless, invert selection, and H-ide; then put those seams:


blender_shot23.jpg



...

(Last step: Align vertices near x=0 to x=0, apply X-axis mirroring, and place the central seam.)