Difference between revisions of "Talk:Development"
(Agree, but let's try to reach a consensus) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --[[User:Zeog|Zeog]] 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST) | The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --[[User:Zeog|Zeog]] 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Sounds like the best way to handle this. However, moving everything over to Development and updating parent links will take a substantial amount of labor, so let's try to reach some kind of a consensus before we proceed. -[[User:Halleck|Halleck]] 06:54, 11 January 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 11 January 2006
Subsectons: Keep or Abolish?
Do we need the subsections such as Development:Graphics? I think we need to go one of two ways on this- either list all subsection articles in the subsection only (i.e. not on the main Development article) or abolish subsections completely and list everything at Development. -Halleck 02:48, 11 January 2006 (PST)
The Development:Graphics page is a stub. Let's keep the hierarchy flat and move everything to Development-Subsection. The Develompment pages then serves as a hub (and the only one). You have an overview already with the first look at it. That's good. --Zeog 05:38, 11 January 2006 (PST)
- Sounds like the best way to handle this. However, moving everything over to Development and updating parent links will take a substantial amount of labor, so let's try to reach some kind of a consensus before we proceed. -Halleck 06:54, 11 January 2006 (PST)
