Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Database"

From VsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
** etc...
 
** etc...
  
I don't really care much whether "glossary" or "terminology" is used, so we can use whichever.
+
*[[User:jackS]] I don't really care much whether "glossary" or "terminology" is used, so we can use whichever.
 
+
:
If we want to split ships and upgrades into separate categories, let's do so with some sort of "Items and Technologies" (or better equivalent name) category, and put Ships, Weapons, Upgrades, and Cargo items in as subcategories.
+
:If we want to split ships and upgrades into separate categories, let's do so with some sort of "Items and Technologies" (or better :equivalent name) category, and put Ships, Weapons, Upgrades, and Cargo items in as subcategories.
 
+
:
I'm actually quite fond of "Sapients and Other Noteworthy Species" ;-)
+
:I'm actually quite fond of "Sapients and Other Noteworthy Species" ;-)
 
+
:
but umm sure, let's figure something out.
+
:but umm sure, let's figure something out.

Revision as of 22:44, 28 February 2005

  • @JackS: Wouldn't it be better to name the pages like in this list? Vegastrike#TODO pontiac 12:46, 28 Feb 2005 (PST)
  • Here's my suggestion pontiac
I tried to make the names as simple as possible.
Everything below is categorized under Category:Database and linked there)
  • User:jackS I don't really care much whether "glossary" or "terminology" is used, so we can use whichever.
If we want to split ships and upgrades into separate categories, let's do so with some sort of "Items and Technologies" (or better :equivalent name) category, and put Ships, Weapons, Upgrades, and Cargo items in as subcategories.
I'm actually quite fond of "Sapients and Other Noteworthy Species" ;-)
but umm sure, let's figure something out.