Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vessels and Installations"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*[[User:jackS|jackS]] 19:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) see [[Ships:Acrotatus]] | *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 19:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) see [[Ships:Acrotatus]] | ||
| − | *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also [[Category:Ships:Civilian]] and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything | + | *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also [[:Category:Ships:Civilian]] and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything |
:also, see [[Ships:Admonisher]] for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) ) | :also, see [[Ships:Admonisher]] for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) ) | ||
Revision as of 09:13, 3 March 2005
- Wouldn't it be better to have the ships in an extra namespace like this Ship:Acrotatus as it is with the Terminology right now ? pontiac 01:22, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Of course it would be quite easy to move the pages to this new locations (there are just alot of them ;) ) pontiac 01:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
Sounds like a good idea. I'm sure we can move slowly them as we edit them for content. jackS 02:20, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
- jackS 19:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) see Ships:Acrotatus
- jackS 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also Category:Ships:Civilian and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything
- also, see Ships:Admonisher for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) )
