Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vessels and Installations"
(comments) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also [[:Category:Vessels:Civilian]] and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything | *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also [[:Category:Vessels:Civilian]] and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything | ||
:also, see [[Vessel:Admonisher]] for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) ) | :also, see [[Vessel:Admonisher]] for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) ) | ||
| + | *[[User:Silverain|Silverain]] 16:11, 4 Apr 2005 (PDT) I linked to the hud.png at sourceforge as a temp measure to see how it looks. Short of getting larger screenshots and storing them in the gallery somewhere, this is all I can think of. | ||
*[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:30, 3 Mar 2005 (PST)Well, moved all of the pages, but haven't updated this page to reflect that (only works right now because of re-directs). Also, still need to fix all the next and previous fields to not be "FIXME" (of course, I also have to put in entries for all but 3 of the articles, but I try not to depress myself too much :) | *[[User:jackS|jackS]] 23:30, 3 Mar 2005 (PST)Well, moved all of the pages, but haven't updated this page to reflect that (only works right now because of re-directs). Also, still need to fix all the next and previous fields to not be "FIXME" (of course, I also have to put in entries for all but 3 of the articles, but I try not to depress myself too much :) | ||
| − | + | ** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] On a sidenote: Do you think that a previous/next link is a good idea with this many vessle/installation-entries? Sure it's possible, but is it maintainable? Maybe we should limit this nav-menu to the manual and the linking between big topics (e.g vessles->installations->weapons->...) and maybe the subsections of them. .. just a though :) | |
| − | *** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 23:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Maybe we could just use something like this: [[Template:Parent_link]] to link to the parent (e.g Vessels & Installations) page. | + | *** [[User:Silverain|Silverain]] 16:11, 4 Apr 2005 (PDT) Maintainable? Difficult but yes, since JackS has put most names in already. I would say have the side links to the next ship, that way people browsing for entertainment can read ship to ship, rather than having to go back to the main page first. |
| + | ** [[User:pontiac|pontiac]] 23:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Maybe we could just use something like this: [[Template:Parent_link]] to link to the parent (e.g Vessels & Installations) page. | ||
{{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}} | {{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}} | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
{{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}} | {{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}} | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 5 April 2005
- Wouldn't it be better to have the ships in an extra namespace like this Vessel:Acrotatus as it is with the Terminology right now ? pontiac 01:22, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Of course it would be quite easy to move the pages to this new locations (there are just alot of them ;) ) pontiac 01:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
Sounds like a good idea. I'm sure we can move slowly them as we edit them for content. jackS 02:20, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
- jackS 19:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) see Vessel:Acrotatus
- jackS 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also Category:Vessels:Civilian and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything
- also, see Vessel:Admonisher for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) )
- Silverain 16:11, 4 Apr 2005 (PDT) I linked to the hud.png at sourceforge as a temp measure to see how it looks. Short of getting larger screenshots and storing them in the gallery somewhere, this is all I can think of.
- jackS 23:30, 3 Mar 2005 (PST)Well, moved all of the pages, but haven't updated this page to reflect that (only works right now because of re-directs). Also, still need to fix all the next and previous fields to not be "FIXME" (of course, I also have to put in entries for all but 3 of the articles, but I try not to depress myself too much :)
- pontiac On a sidenote: Do you think that a previous/next link is a good idea with this many vessle/installation-entries? Sure it's possible, but is it maintainable? Maybe we should limit this nav-menu to the manual and the linking between big topics (e.g vessles->installations->weapons->...) and maybe the subsections of them. .. just a though :)
- Silverain 16:11, 4 Apr 2005 (PDT) Maintainable? Difficult but yes, since JackS has put most names in already. I would say have the side links to the next ship, that way people browsing for entertainment can read ship to ship, rather than having to go back to the main page first.
- pontiac 23:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Maybe we could just use something like this: Template:Parent_link to link to the parent (e.g Vessels & Installations) page.
- pontiac On a sidenote: Do you think that a previous/next link is a good idea with this many vessle/installation-entries? Sure it's possible, but is it maintainable? Maybe we should limit this nav-menu to the manual and the linking between big topics (e.g vessles->installations->weapons->...) and maybe the subsections of them. .. just a though :)
 Vessels & Installations
|
{{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}
