Talk:Vessels and Installations

Wouldn't it be better to have the ships in an extra namespace like this Vessel:Acrotatus as it is with the Terminology right now ? pontiac 01:22, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Of course it would be quite easy to move the pages to this new locations (there are just alot of them ;) ) pontiac 01:38, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)

Sounds like a good idea. I'm sure we can move slowly them as we edit them for content. jackS 02:20, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)

jackS 23:11, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) See also Category:Vessels:Civilian and the accompanying talk page for a potential issue with renaming everything

also, see Vessel:Admonisher for another look at a ship page (this one actually being in-game-- it needs a picture :) )

jackS 23:30, 3 Mar 2005 (PST)Well, moved all of the pages, but haven't updated this page to reflect that (only works right now because of re-directs). Also, still need to fix all the next and previous fields to not be "FIXME" (of course, I also have to put in entries for all but 3 of the articles, but I try not to depress myself too much :)
- - pontiac On a sidenote: Do you think that a previous/next link is a good idea with this many vessle/installation-entries? Sure it's possible, but is it maintainable? Maybe we should limit this nav-menu to the manual and the linking between big topics (e.g vessles->installations->weapons->...) and maybe the subsections of them. .. just a though :)
  - pontiac 23:55, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) Maybe we could just use something like this: Template:Parent_link to link to the parent (e.g Vessels & Installations) page.

{{Parent_link | parent=[[Vessels & Installations]]}}

Navigation menu